Unprofessional Conduct

In 2005 I started melting for a inculcate system and correct from the start I could see that in that location was some un lordism in some of the employees there. To me unprofessional means non acting as if you were at you place of business or acting as though you be at home or come prohibited of the closet with your friends. That is how the persons I worked with acted however, to me Mrs. Petit did nothing of the sort. She was not at her place of work she did not ill-use any students so I see now unprofessionalism.What she was doing was having a life outside of work which I theory we were all as citizens entitled to do. When I think of the vocalize immoral in the context of the schooling profession I think of teachers like the iodins I worked with walking more or less the school building talking gravely close to the elementary and middle school students they were teaching during school hours.I do think that Mr. or Mrs.Petit acted immorally in the eyes of the society ar ound them even though they were just living their own blisterings for which this computery was founded, only not to the extent that any harm should have come to them. Was she teaching the infantren right from wrong? Well yes and no, she taught the children with this mishap that it was right to follow your fingerings and to be a leader in society not a follower not to go with the norm, but she also showed that she had no disregard for the laws of the state she lived in by geological fault the law for sexual misconduct.I enkindle not even count on my fingers how many teachers I would deem unfit to teach and Mrs. Petit is not one of them. To me being unfit to teach is a person that thinks that yelling at children is a good thing, or a teacher that is forgeting to put their hands on someones child to discipline them, or to the highest pointedness of the so called teachers now who believe that teaching the children to past a test is preparing them for life.What Mrs. Petit did c an not be deemed as a person who is unfit to teach, she was ejectn to be an outstanding teacher and never harmed a student, they were very well educated and that is be defecate of her. In this case the board was justified due to the fact that she was arrested for breaking the law which would cause a problem for the community whom would of course be outraged by this.I personally believe that they had no just cause in terminating her employment because there was no harm to the children and she had learned her lesson which she could have used as a basis to discourage not only her students but persons in general from doing things that ar illegal. I do not think that what one does in there personal lives as long as it does not in any way transfer into their professional lives should not be the basis for being deemed unfit for their profession or unprofessional in anyway.For recitation if Mr.Carter was a teacher and he never did anything to harm his students or co-workers and he went t o a club on a Friday night, while at this club he saw a beautiful woman but did not see her human face and he walked up behind her and said something like hey beautiful you are looking fine in that dress, the woman turned around at it was a co-worker of his she gets him fired because he made a pass at her while not at work how is this right? What is this teaching the children? It tells them never to try to get a date because it could cost you your job.This example and the story of Mrs. Petit teach children to never have a life outside of work or never get a job that is all it does the rules need to change. The difference amidst the two cases was that she got arrested and the other person did not. Do I think that it was consistent absolutely not? To me the courts had not taken into consideration that the board did not prove that she was an unfit teacher they just proved that she had been arrested for being an individual having fun.She did not harm any of her students, she did not h urt any of her co-workers, she was not on school property and she did not violate the rules of her contract as a teacher unless those rules state that you can not have a life outside of work and if you are married it must be monogamous. I think that the courts should have stated that the only true reason they could fire her was because she now had a reprehensible record and even that should have a fine line because she again did not harm anyone not even her husband because he was there and approved.I think that these so called morals in this country are dumb because everyone has their own mind and should be able to decide what is moral and immoral to them without having to live by a standard of anyone else. The only time I think an employer should know what is going on with an employees cancelled the job conduct is when it can directly affect their job or bring harm to other battalion. If the person has committed a real crime such as murder, child abuse, child molestation, rape, if they are being abused themselves, or involved in other illegal dealings.I think that it is high time society got off of their high horses and stop thinking that they can decide how the person next to them lives their lives. People need to stop worrying about what religion other people practice, who marries whom, who is eating what and worry about real issues like why are so many of our children are going to bed hungry, why our children are out here committing crimes instead of getting an education, and why there are so many people in the streets because they can not get a job.Those are real issues and until people realize that everyone is created equal and that our forefathers came to this country to get away from all of the bull crap that was going on elsewhere society will never change it will only get worse. Things will never get better until we as a people better ourselves.No one should be ridiculed for not being as smart as another, for not eating like someone else, for not having the same religion as another, for not being attracted to the sex you think they should be attracted to, or for having an open marriage we were given these minds to think for ourselves not to think like everyone else. The world is not mysterious and white it is a rainbow made up of browns, reds, greens, yellows and every other color so I think everyone should be free to do like my religions states harm none, and do what ye will meaning do what you want as long as you do not harm anyone else.Unprofessional ConductUNPROFESSIONAL demeanour Introduction Andre Hamilton had spent eight years in the United States Air Force. While in the service, he learned how to conduct himself in a professional manner, and he learned to respect others. He wanted to become a trader so he completed a bachelors degree in organizational management at the University of LaVerne. After graduating from school, his confidence soared to a point where he felt he was in a position of big demand by potentia l employers. In 1996, while looking through Sundays Press Enterprise new-fashionedspaper, he saw an ad for a job fair.Thinking of the companies that would be present at the job fair, he decided to attent. The day of the job fair arrived. His interviews came down to two companies, G. M. A. C. and The Office Supply stack away. some(prenominal) interviews went extremely well. On Friday, September 27, 1996, Andre was interviewed by Mrs. Jane Apple from G. M. A. C. , a mortgage company. At the interview, she explained to him the responsibilities of a loan officer, the position he had applied for. She also asked him questions about what he thought about the company. Mrs.Apple informing him that although the position only paid commisions. Mrs. Apple looked at Andre and said, You have the job if you want it. He tried to profound to contain his happiness. He told her he would accept her offer and thanked her for giving him an opportunity. On Monday, September 30, 1996, when he arrived a t work, he was greeted and introduced to the staff members and shown around the office. Mrs. Apple told him to relax. Andre began to feel that he had accomplished his goal of becoming a career person with a good job.Everyone was very friendly and seemed happy to be employed at that company. What he enjoyed the most about this organization was the team style of leadership demoed by Mrs. Apple. On Tuesday, October 1, 1996, he had second interview with The Office Supply Store. He was interviewed by Mr. Smith, district manager, and Maria Smith, human resources director. They were very pleasant and energetic and he got the impression that the work environment at The Office Supply Store was the same as at G. M. A. C.After the interview, he was told he had the position and would receive a letter in the mail telling him the information and the store where he would be working. He decided to accept the job offered from The Office Supply Store, because he wanted to move into management. Also at G. M. A. C. , his only income is commision, while at The Office Supply Store, he would have a steady salary. He also likes the close location to his home. The Office Supply Store would train him to manage his own store. On Wednesday, he returned to G. M. A. C. and inform Mrs.Apple that he had been made an offer by The Office Supply Store and he felt it would be a beter opportunity for him. She listened to him and sounded sincere when she informed him that she understood why he had come to his decision. Ending the conversation, she told him that if it didnt work out at The Office Supply Store, he should call her and she would gladly give him another opportunity. After receiving the letter telling him where to report the work, he arrived at his training store. Andre was to meet with Mrs. Richards, the general manager, who was also his new boss.When he reached the general managers office, he introduced himself and informed her that he was sent to this store by district manager to b egin his management training. Her face begin to flush. She just stared at him and Why are you here? You are supposed to be at the orientation meeting she said sharply. He informed her that according to the letter he received from the district manager and gave it to her. She asked him to have a seat in the break area next to her office, while she straightened out the situation over the phone. He began to get angry at the nasty language she was using.He felt this showed a total lack of professionalism. The more he thought about his reception, the angier he became. He even thought about punching her in face or engaging her with some profanity of his own. In looking at possible pickaxs he had in this situation, his first option was definitely to punch her in the face, but he knew that would result in trouble with the police. Another option was just the walk out the door, but he took the attitude that he would overcome this and proceeded to convince himself that this was an isolated eve nt.He felt this was the Standard grin and bear it system of maintaining a job. After he had calmed down, he viewed the situation from a more practical perspective. He told himself that he should probably just start looking for a new job. He decided he should remain silent on this issue, because he had continuously heard people say throughout the years breakt rock the boat. Finally, the last option he thought of was to talk with the district manager about his experience, but the district managers ingrained reaction would be to defend Mrs.Richards behaviour, and label him with an attitude problem. So he did nothing. Over the next few weeks, the general manager continued to display the same level of behaviour. Andre even tried to communicate with her as two mature adults. To his disappointment, he felt that she appeared uncaring and uncooperative. The problem which is emphasized in this event can be explained with main components of attitudes and major job attitudes, responses to d issatisfaction, job rotation, fundamental attribution error, emotional intelligence, and Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory.